|
|
Training
For
Paramotor
Pilots | Safety
| Why Use A Certified Instructor?
While no
training is required for powered paragliding it would be incredible
folly not to get any. This sport is certainly much simpler than other
forms of aviation but requires skills and knowledge not present in those
other forms. Whatever training has been received can be compared with
what is contained in our program. The intent is to provide an industry
standard of skills and experience with recommended weather conditions
according to those standards. Get thorough training and insist that the
USPPA syllabus is used.
Find
Schools | Simulator
Project | FAA
Part 103 | Safety
Page | Incentive
|
Training
Exemption
April 20,
2008
|
| The USPPA applied for a new exemption that
will hopefully return at least foot launched tandems to legal status. We
have been working with AFS 800 in Washington in an effort to obtain the
exemption for foot launched tandem instruction.
The proceedings were begun in February, 2008. Then in
April, after being told that the wheeled exemption would not be granted,
our request was amended to limit its scope to craft where the pilot and
passenger must support at least their own weight on foot for takeoff and
landing. The exemption would be structured more like USHPA's where
tandem instructors first gain required experience taking up rated pilots
before flying students. Tandem instructors will
immediately be those who were USPPA/USUA tandem instructors as of Jan
31, 2008. Any USPPA/USUA instructor who was also certified by another
org as a tandem pilot and meets the minimum experience requirements of
USPPA will be offered tandem instructor status.
The initial cadre of Tandem administrators would be
chosen from those who have logged experience as instructors and tandem
pilots, who also have experience evaluating other pilots, namely by
administering ratings. They must have recommendations by two of their
USPPA instructor peers, agree to the Tandem Instructors Commitment and
be approved by the USPPA training committee.
Providing this exemption goes through, it will be incumbent on the
tandem instructors to insure that rules are followed. Otherwise,
continuance of the exemption would be in doubt. Our goal is to remove
this program from the exemption process and make it part of a rule.
We will work with other organizations in an effort to
make sure standards are the same from one to another.
We'll keep you posted here. |
 |
Training
Program Changes (Download PDF)
Nov
28,
2006
|
| Changes
were approved in October to allow for quicker testing of highly
experienced pilots. The standards are identical but now pilots with more
flight time can obtain a rating after showing only 2 of the last 3 spot
landings (power-allowed and power off). This change affects the PPG2 and
PPG3.
The intent is to allow instructors who are primarily
testing pilots for a rating to be able to complete it within a weekend
(2-day) clinic. Also the online tests have been modified to streamline
and improve their accuracy. Contact your nearest USPPA Instructor to
obtain a rating.
The syllabus, available to USPPA/USUA instructors, has
also been updated.
|
 |
The Danger Zone
Oct
21,
2006
|
|
Low is dangerous. Below 200 feet above ground level
(AGL) is the danger zone. It commands enormous attention and is best
avoided to minimize risk.
A recent wire accident highlights the significant risk
from flying in the "danger zone." A highly experienced pilot,
flying in his familiar area, was cruising beside a road at about 75
feet. After being distracted, he clipped high tension wires that run
within a mile of the field. Fortunately both occupants of the two-place
craft escaped without injury but a power company manager (and paramotor
pilot) who happened to be on-scene explained that only a very strange
set of circumstances prevented them from being electrocuted.
Other fatalities have resulted from low maneuvering,
including wire strikes. The significant lesson from this near-tragedy is
that the risk is present even in a familiar area and to experienced
pilots.
Remember that power lines push with between 4000 volts
and 400,000 volts. At those levels, paraglider lines can easily be
conductive and a pilot who climbs down with the wires still live, may
well be electrocuted. See USPPA's Top 10
Tips on PPG Safety.
|

This was the site of a serious injury
wire-strike crash. The bridge in front of the pictured flyer has wires
running only 12 feet overhead and the poles are unusually far apart with
one being obscured in trees. The area was only 2 miles from the pilot's
primary field. |
See
& Avoid
Oct
14,
2006
|
| A
simple flight around New Mexico became a tragedy when two pilots
collided, one in level flight, the other turning slowly. From jumbo jets
to paramotors, it is among the least survivable of all accident types.
It is also the most preventable. Most "midairs," aviation
parlance for airborne collisions, occur in the pattern. Those that don't
tend to be merging collisions, where one pilot drifts into another. That
is what happened in Albuquerque where the pilots were out of the
pattern.
We're all told to "clear our turns" but how?
Most of the battle is simply the discipline to clear the turn every
time. It's easy to go into a shallow turn without looking and rarely
is there ever a problem. But when even one other pilot is around, it can
obviously be critical.
When planning a turn, follow these steps: "Look,
shallow, up, down, turn." That means turn your head to look
in the direction of turn, then start a shallow bank in
that direction to alert others of your impending turn, then look up
and down in the direction of turn and finally start the turn.
The up and down look is to catch a pilot that you may be turning towards
who is above or below you and slightly behind. That is what appears to
have happened in New Mexico.
The key is to make it a habit. If you catch yourself
starting a turn without doing those actions, level out, do the actions,
and turn. It is a habit that may save your life. The steps can be done
in two seconds—lets help remind ourselves and our fellow pilots to be
more vigilant next time if we notice turns executed without
taking this precaution.
Also, keep up a periodic scan when flying with others
and avoid flying side by side on cross country-type flights. It's too
easy to lose track of another pilot and drift into each other. Fly
staggered so that each pilot is always in another's periphery. Scan up
and down, too. One near-collision occurred when a pilot below climbed
into a pilot above. The top pilot was fortunately able to climb out of
it since the closure rate was slow.
We have a lot of gatherings and even small ones carry
enormous risk. The New Mexico tragedy had only 9 pilots in the air at
the time. While the odds may be relatively low, the consequences are
enormous.
Other practices include 1) avoid "sneaking
up" on a pilot, 2) avoid close formation flying, especially with
less experienced pilots, and never touch wingtips, 3) when flying
formation always have an out that you can execute immediately, 4)
photography is risky due to the distraction factor, be especially
vigilant, 5) establish and use a takeoff/landing pattern at new flying
sites.
|

Fly staggered, where one pilot can always
see the other. And before turning:
-
Look first
(clearly turn head) in the direction of turn.
-
Shallow bank
to start so others see that you're turning before the flight path
actually changes much..
-
Look up
and down
in the direction of turn.
-
Turn with
the desired brake pressure..
|
Ratings
Program Change
Aug
28,
2006
|
|
After reviewing instructor comments and observations,
we have made a change to the PPG2 rating requirement that makes it more
realistic. The spot landing requirements have been modified and changed
to allow a slightly larger area that better reflects the skills
necessary for safe flying. Of course it's always good to strive for more
skill and better accuracy but a pilot who can consistently land within
40 feet of his target has a sufficient grasp of the craft to warrant the
PPG2, our basic pilot rating. Relative to speed, this is still stricter
than what's required of an FAA private pilot (the equivalent of a PPG2
in their certified world).
The full ratings document, now maintained as a PDF, is
available on the Ratings page or click here.
|
Paramotor
Pilot
Ratings
|
Advisory
Circular AC
103-7
Aug
22,
2006
|
| AC103-7
was put out in 1984 and answers many questions regarding the intent of
the regulation, especially as it applies to commercial operations
questions. We've put it under resources (with our other FAA
Part 103 material) in an easy-to-read format (click
here).
This is in response to a number of questions that have
come in regarding how a PPG can be used for advertisement and other
uses. The gist is that it cannot. You can have lettering on your wing
but cannot fly for the purpose of advertising any business. If someone
buys you a wing and you're just flying it, that's fine as long as
they're not telling you where or when or how much you must fly it.
|

|
USPPA/USUA
Tandem Program is Operational
July
17,
2006
|
| The
USUA and USPPA have teamed up to implement an industry standard tandem
training and certification program that is appropriately thorough yet
accessible. One of the main goals is to standardize the training so that
new tandem pilots go out into the field qualified to teach students
while airborne. USPPA ratings apply to the program however USUA
membership is required to become a tandem pilot. Also, pilots can get
all their ratings entirely through USUA, at their choice since we are
sharing the ratings program now.
Major tenets are:
1. It recognizes the huge difference between foot
launched tandem and wheel launched tandem.
2. Experienced PPG pilots take several flights with
the Tandem Instructor from the pilots position until they are
comfortable flying the craft. They get certified as Tandem Trainees then
gain experience flying with other certified PPG pilots (PPG 2 or
higher).
3. Once the Tandem Trainee has accumulated 24 tandem
flights, he works with a Tandem Administrator to become a Tandem
Instructor.
4. An initial group of USPPA instructors who are also
experienced training with Tandems will be our starting Tandem
Administrators. Once they are processed, a list of who can provide the
tandem ratings will be provided.
Like our new instructor program, the intent is to both
train and evaluate. For more information, please visit our Tandem
Ratings page under Ratings.
|
This is clearly a powered
paraglider that falls under the auspices of our program. We must be
careful when adding wheels that it does not fall under the FAR Sport
Pilot rules.
|
PPC
Fatality reported as PPG
July
12,
2006
|
|
There was a tragedy recently In Newcastle, Wyoming
involving an Infinity Powered Parachute under an ASAP elliptical wing.
Our condolences go out to the family.
It was originally reported as a powered paraglider
although the distinction must be minimized since the facts of the
accident are very relevant to us all.
After talking with the County Coroner, it appears that
a minimally trained pilot was flying in unusually strong conditions
early in the morning. The wreckage was found downwind of a large terrain
feature that rose more than 300 feet AGL. Damage to the unit was
consistent with a nose-low hard impact on the right side and immediate
rollover to the right. Ground scarring was minimal beyond the initial
impact.
The ASAP Thunderbolt wing was an elliptical type which
is generally similar to a PPG wing and therefore more responsive with
more active control required in turbulence.
The pilot's typical flight involved flying low to
inspect his land and so it seems probable that he encountered strong
rotor in the lee of the hill and got into an oscillation that worsened
until ground impact or simply lost control. Damage to the propeller
suggested a high power setting.
The fact that this is a powered parachute is of little
consequence -- a powered paraglider would have been just as susceptible.
The pilot was flying in the morning and thought that would relieve him
of the need to be an expert wing handler. Rotor doesn't care what time
it is -- if there is wind and obstructions, there is rotor in the lee.
It is a great reminder of natures power and how much respect that power
deserves.
|
The USPPA got involved
when a "powered paraglider" accident was reported to us. After
determining it was a powered parachute, it was referred to Roy
Beisswinger (www.NAPPF.org), who is a
powered parachute expert.
It will not go in our
incident database but we can certainly learn from it.
|
The Riskiest Part of PPG?
June
17,
2006
|
|
It says something about the safety of our
flying...unfortunately, before the flying is the starting. A look at
incident reports and other accounts paints a clear picture:
The greatest risk for
serious injury is
an encounter with the propeller!
The hardest part of avoiding this risk is complacency
- we start this thing constantly and every time it pops and idles. No
problem. Or maybe it doesn't start and we begin trouble shooting -
trying the throttle in different positions, using different holds on the
frame, etc. but getting more complacent with each failed attempt.
Force yourself to check the throttle linkage before
pulling it - verify that the carburetor goes to idle after releasing the
throttle.
Force yourself to make sure the throttle is in a
position where a thrusting motor won't push it more.
Force yourself to hold the frame in ready position to
accept full power if it happens. Better yet, start it on your back with
someone's help. If the option exists, use it. This is where a fully
charged electric starter is a benefit - start it on your back!
We want our members (and everyone else, for that
matter) to keep their throttle fingers, heads and other extremities
available for future fly-ins!
|

|
Did You Use a Syllabus?
Aug
20,
2006
|
|
Every USPPA Instructor is provided with and encouraged
to use the USPPA syllabus or an equivalent. airspace? Site Selection?
Did you learn about emergencies? More importantly, did you rehearse
reaction to those emergencies? Airlines, even with their highly
experienced crews, have found that only rehearsal ensures that
procedures will be done correctly. Rehearsing various maladies has
proven critical.
The syllabus covers these and many other topics. If
you didn't get this training, you should!
Both the instructor and student initial each item as
it's completed. Schools should either use this syllabus or their own
version that requires initials and includes at least the same material.
|
|
Last Chance
Dec
15,
2004
|
| The
experienced pilot was doing aerobatics with a Fresh Breeze "Flyke,"
a bicycle-looking wheeled PPG craft. It was supposed to be a loop but he
didn't quite make it over the top.
After the cart flipped over and got some lines caught
the pilot, Andi Siebenhofer, thought the glider would likely start an
uncontrollable spiral and tossed his reserve.
The landing under reserve was cushioned further by going through the
edge of trees and the craft wound up on it's wheels, essentially
un-damaged and with the motor still running (he shut it off immediately
thereafter). The trees can also make such landings far worse if they
collapse the chute causing the pilot to drop more quickly through them.
This demonstrates both the risk of aerobatics and the
value of a reserve. Understand that while the vast majority of reserve
deployments succeed in saving their user, not all function properly and
so they should be viewed as a last chance in scenarios where the
alternative is far worse.
Also, proper installation and training are critical
for successful use.
The still series is excerpted from an upcoming book. The original video,
used by permission of Fresh Breeze, can be found at www.SouthernSkies.net.
|

|
Wishing You Were...
Jan
07,
2005
|
|
It is rightfully well worn, the adage "It is
better to be on the ground wishing to be in the air, than in the air
wishing to be on the ground." This picture (below), by Jerry
Starbuck of Blue Ridge
Paragliding, illustrates the point grandly.
Jerry happens to be quite adept with Photoshop, too.
|
|
SIV Clinics: Good or Bad?
Aug
20,
2006
|
|
These are also called maneuvers or safety clinics and
they intend to let a pilot experience wing malfunctions and other
unusual situations under reasonably safe, controlled conditions. They
hope to improve your ability to handle such situations in "the
wild."
The USPPA does NOT sanction, certify or endorse these
clinics in any way. Most instructors do recognize their value if run
professionally by experienced pilots who take appropriate precautions.
You must seek out your own source to know whether a particular
instructor is suited for any offered clinic.
Also, attendees should understand that serious injury
is possible at the clinic but far more likely afterwards
if the pilot go out thinking they can do maneuvers, on their own, over
the ground (especially low). Before attending a clinic check with your
instructor about your experience and appropriateness of what you are
considering.
It can be a valuable, fun resource if done properly.
|
|
|